Triple

T3966422
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Weeks v. United States E92226 entity
Predicate citationStyle P4468 FINISHED
Object Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914) E92226 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914) | Statement: [Weeks v. United States, citationStyle, Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914)]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914)
Context triple: [Weeks v. United States, citationStyle, Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914)]
  • A. Weeks v. United States chosen
    Weeks v. United States is a landmark 1914 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the federal exclusionary rule, barring evidence obtained through unconstitutional searches and seizures from being used in federal prosecutions.
  • B. United States v. Butler
    United States v. Butler was a 1936 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down key provisions of the New Deal’s Agricultural Adjustment Act as an unconstitutional use of federal taxing and spending power.
  • C. Reynolds v. United States
    Reynolds v. United States is an 1879 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the distinction between protected religious belief and regulable religiously motivated conduct, holding that the Free Exercise Clause does not excuse individuals from compliance with otherwise valid criminal laws such as those banning polygamy.
  • D. Abrams v. United States
    Abrams v. United States was a 1919 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the conviction of antiwar activists under federal law and is best known for Justice Holmes’s famous dissent articulating the “marketplace of ideas” concept in free speech jurisprudence.
  • E. Downes v. Bidwell
    Downes v. Bidwell is a 1901 U.S. Supreme Court case that helped establish the "Insular Cases" doctrine, holding that full constitutional rights do not automatically extend to all territories under American control.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69aed96624188190ac8c45bb57ab72b5 completed March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69aef976f4fc8190b2c16ab62c19cdb8 completed March 9, 2026, 4:46 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69b54006b5e48190973e30055a0893a5 completed March 14, 2026, 11:01 a.m.
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:32 p.m.