Triple

T3966408
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Weeks v. United States E92226 entity
Predicate relatedCase P3137 FINISHED
Object Mapp v. Ohio E15566 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Mapp v. Ohio | Statement: [Weeks v. United States, relatedCase, Mapp v. Ohio]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Mapp v. Ohio
Context triple: [Weeks v. United States, relatedCase, Mapp v. Ohio]
  • A. Mapp v. Ohio chosen
    Mapp v. Ohio is a landmark 1961 U.S. Supreme Court case that applied the exclusionary rule to the states, holding that evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment cannot be used in state criminal prosecutions.
  • B. Brandenburg v. Ohio
    Brandenburg v. Ohio is a 1969 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly strengthened free speech protections by establishing the "imminent lawless action" test for when advocacy of violence can be punished under the First Amendment.
  • C. Miranda v. Arizona
    Miranda v. Arizona is a landmark 1966 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the requirement for police to inform criminal suspects of their rights to remain silent and to have an attorney present during custodial interrogations.
  • D. Katz v. United States
    Katz v. United States is a landmark 1967 Supreme Court case that redefined Fourth Amendment protections by establishing that the amendment safeguards people’s reasonable expectations of privacy, not just physical places.
  • E. Johnson v. Zerbst
    Johnson v. Zerbst is a 1938 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held federal courts must provide counsel to indigent defendants in serious criminal cases unless there is a competent and intelligent waiver.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69aed96624188190ac8c45bb57ab72b5 completed March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69aef976f4fc8190b2c16ab62c19cdb8 completed March 9, 2026, 4:46 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69b5400311bc81908379313e2d444557 completed March 14, 2026, 11:01 a.m.
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:32 p.m.