Triple
T3956339
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Rule 72 |
E85787
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasSection |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Rule 72(b) |
E85787
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Rule 72(b) | Statement: [Rule 72, hasSection, Rule 72(b)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Rule 72(b) Context triple: [Rule 72, hasSection, Rule 72(b)]
-
A.
Rule 72
chosen
Rule 72 is a provision of the U.S. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that governs how parties may object to and seek review of decisions made by magistrate judges in civil cases.
-
B.
Rule 7
Rule 7 is a provision of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure that governs the use, form, and content of indictments and informations in federal criminal cases.
-
C.
Rule 82
Rule 82 is a provision of the U.S. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that clarifies the rules do not extend or limit the jurisdiction of federal courts or venue requirements.
-
D.
Rule 612
Rule 612 is a provision of the Federal Rules of Evidence that governs how a witness may use writings or other items to refresh their memory while testifying.
-
E.
Rule 405
Rule 405 is a provision of the Federal Rules of Evidence that governs the methods by which a party may prove a person’s character when character is admissible as evidence in a case.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69aed93a96908190bcbdbfa718f155bd |
completed | March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aef93f3ad48190b96b98b4aecd6030 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 4:45 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69b533aea08c8190b83d83e3ba89848c |
completed | March 14, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:31 p.m.