Triple
T394125
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | High Courts of Japan |
E8942
|
entity |
| Predicate | canRemand |
P12548
|
FINISHED |
| Object | cases to lower courts |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: cases to lower courts | Statement: [High Courts of Japan, canRemand, cases to lower courts]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canRemand Context triple: [High Courts of Japan, canRemand, cases to lower courts]
-
A.
appealsFrom
Indicates that a decision, judgment, or ruling is being challenged and taken to a higher authority or court for review.
-
B.
canRaise
Indicates that one entity has the ability or authority to increase, elevate, or lift another entity (such as a value, object, or status).
-
C.
canConcurIn
Indicates that one entity is able or permitted to agree with, coincide with, or participate jointly in the same event, decision, or condition as another entity.
-
D.
canMake
Indicates that one entity has the ability or capacity to create, produce, or assemble another entity.
-
E.
wasOverturnedByCourt
Indicates that a prior decision, ruling, or judgment was reversed or nullified by a court.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e7f55c60819097aff65ea2ca2832 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2ec77a8a08190b6f96373aa8c1346 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:24 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2e96bd3848190a66ca14dfbd26da5 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:11 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a2ea7d03a88190aab72e61d8673488 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:15 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:08 p.m.