Triple

T3933915
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Pixel 9 E90862 entity
Predicate hardwareDesign P52627 FINISHED
Object Google in-house hardware design LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Google in-house hardware design | Statement: [Pixel 9, hardwareDesign, Google in-house hardware design]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hardwareDesign
Context triple: [Pixel 9, hardwareDesign, Google in-house hardware design]
  • A. circuitDesigner
    Indicates that an entity is responsible for designing or creating electronic circuits for another entity or system.
  • B. circuit
    Indicates that one entity forms or participates in an electrical or logical pathway that allows current or signals to flow through a connected system involving another entity.
  • C. softwareModel
    Indicates that one entity serves as a software-based representation or abstraction (a model) of another entity or system.
  • D. graphicsArchitecture
    Indicates the underlying design or structural framework that defines how a system’s graphics or visual rendering components are organized and operate.
  • E. designedWith
    Indicates that one entity was created, planned, or developed using another entity as a tool, method, or guiding basis in its design process.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69aed95f26e0819094b0e71974543a19 completed March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69aeedcab1808190bf653f29062cdddb completed March 9, 2026, 3:56 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69aee7625ad4819097e4e8a168c19274 completed March 9, 2026, 3:29 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69aeed3260cc8190bf294bdab507b1f9 completed March 9, 2026, 3:54 p.m.
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:23 p.m.