Triple

T3925195
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Honda Accord E93257 entity
Predicate competitor P1375 FINISHED
Object Hyundai Sonata E196142 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hyundai Sonata | Statement: [Honda Accord, competitor, Hyundai Sonata]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Hyundai Sonata
Context triple: [Honda Accord, competitor, Hyundai Sonata]
  • A. Hyundai Sonata chosen
    The Hyundai Sonata is a popular mid-size family sedan known for its value, modern styling, and extensive features.
  • B. Hyundai Elantra
    The Hyundai Elantra is a compact sedan known for its value-oriented pricing, fuel efficiency, and extensive features, competing with popular models like the Honda Civic.
  • C. Kia Optima
    The Kia Optima is a midsize family sedan known for its value, modern styling, and generous features.
  • D. Nissan Altima
    The Nissan Altima is a popular mid-size sedan known for its balance of comfort, fuel efficiency, and everyday practicality.
  • E. Ford Fusion
    The Ford Fusion is a mid-size sedan produced by Ford, known for its mainstream appeal, fuel-efficient powertrains, and role as one of the brand’s core passenger cars in the 2000s and 2010s.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69aed96bfa1081908f7b30f2c647dee6 completed March 9, 2026, 2:30 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69aeed7f3cc881909464db1970ba39ae completed March 9, 2026, 3:55 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69b52873d5a881909c4c29f06b94a467 completed March 14, 2026, 9:20 a.m.
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:23 p.m.