Triple

T3919418
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Homilies on the Gospel of Matthew E88921 entity
Predicate interpretiveMethod P21759 FINISHED
Object literal-historical exegesis LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: literal-historical exegesis | Statement: [Homilies on the Gospel of Matthew, interpretiveMethod, literal-historical exegesis]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: interpretiveMethod
Context triple: [Homilies on the Gospel of Matthew, interpretiveMethod, literal-historical exegesis]
  • A. interpretationMethod chosen
    Indicates the method, technique, or process used to interpret or derive meaning from something.
  • B. interpretiveStatus
    Indicates the evaluative or explanatory stance assigned to something, such as how it is understood, classified, or interpreted within a given context.
  • C. isInterpretedBy
    Indicates that something (such as data, a work, or a signal) is given meaning, understanding, or explanation by a particular agent or process.
  • D. eraInterpreted
    Indicates that one entity has been interpreted, understood, or given meaning by another entity.
  • E. interpretedInCase
    Indicates that something is understood, analyzed, or given meaning within the context of a particular case or specific situational scenario.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69aed955229881909e85e73ffab1d343 completed March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69aef188b474819087680db42b04ecdd completed March 9, 2026, 4:12 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69aee75eedcc81908088ff4dbb8be56b completed March 9, 2026, 3:29 p.m.
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:22 p.m.