Triple
T3913310
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Barnard v. Thorstenn |
E87374
|
entity |
| Predicate | usedAsPrecedentFor |
P3138
|
FINISHED |
| Object | challenges to residency-based restrictions on professional practice |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: challenges to residency-based restrictions on professional practice | Statement: [Barnard v. Thorstenn, usedAsPrecedentFor, challenges to residency-based restrictions on professional practice]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usedAsPrecedentFor Context triple: [Barnard v. Thorstenn, usedAsPrecedentFor, challenges to residency-based restrictions on professional practice]
-
A.
hasCourtPrecedence
Indicates that one court decision or ruling holds authoritative priority over another in legal reasoning or application.
-
B.
precedentFor
chosen
Indicates that one situation, decision, or case serves as an authoritative example or basis for deciding or interpreting another.
-
C.
precedentInterpreted
Indicates that one legal precedent is interpreted or understood in a particular way, often as clarified or applied in subsequent decisions or analyses.
-
D.
usedInCourts
Indicates that something is employed or applied within legal court settings, such as in judicial proceedings or courtroom processes.
-
E.
precedentSystem
Indicates that one legal system or framework serves as a source of precedent or authoritative guidance for another system.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69aed9424514819086e9c58adde6652d |
completed | March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aef188b474819087680db42b04ecdd |
completed | March 9, 2026, 4:12 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69aee75eedcc81908088ff4dbb8be56b |
completed | March 9, 2026, 3:29 p.m. |
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:22 p.m.