Triple
T3913307
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Barnard v. Thorstenn |
E87374
|
entity |
| Predicate | citationRelationship |
P11063
|
FINISHED |
| Object | followed reasoning of Supreme Court of New Hampshire v. Piper |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: followed reasoning of Supreme Court of New Hampshire v. Piper | Statement: [Barnard v. Thorstenn, citationRelationship, followed reasoning of Supreme Court of New Hampshire v. Piper]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: citationRelationship Context triple: [Barnard v. Thorstenn, citationRelationship, followed reasoning of Supreme Court of New Hampshire v. Piper]
-
A.
citationBy
Indicates that one work is cited or referenced by another work.
-
B.
citationSystem
Indicates a relationship where one entity specifies or uses a particular system, style, or standard for formatting and managing citations.
-
C.
citation
Indicates that one entity references, quotes, or otherwise acknowledges another entity as a source of information or authority.
-
D.
citesAs
chosen
Indicates that one entity references or acknowledges another as a source of information, authority, or evidence.
-
E.
citationNote
Indicates that a note or comment provides additional information, clarification, or context about a specific citation or reference.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69aed9424514819086e9c58adde6652d |
completed | March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aef188b474819087680db42b04ecdd |
completed | March 9, 2026, 4:12 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69aee75eedcc81908088ff4dbb8be56b |
completed | March 9, 2026, 3:29 p.m. |
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:22 p.m.