Triple
T3913248
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hicklin v. Orbeck |
E87372
|
entity |
| Predicate | resultForLaw |
P2931
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Alaska Hire law invalidated |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Alaska Hire law invalidated | Statement: [Hicklin v. Orbeck, resultForLaw, Alaska Hire law invalidated]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: resultForLaw Context triple: [Hicklin v. Orbeck, resultForLaw, Alaska Hire law invalidated]
-
A.
legalOutcome
chosen
Indicates the resulting legal status, decision, or consequence that follows from a legal process, action, or judgment.
-
B.
legalCase
Indicates a relationship where a formal legal dispute or proceeding exists between parties, typically adjudicated by a court or similar authority.
-
C.
legalDoctrine
Indicates that one legal principle, rule, or theory is being applied, referenced, or relied upon as an authoritative basis for interpreting or deciding a legal issue.
-
D.
legalCaseAlongside
Indicates that two or more legal cases are proceeding in parallel or in coordination, such that they are related or handled together in some aspect of the legal process.
-
E.
legalRulingNature
Indicates the type or character of a legal ruling, such as its form, basis, or procedural nature.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69aed9424514819086e9c58adde6652d |
completed | March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aef188b474819087680db42b04ecdd |
completed | March 9, 2026, 4:12 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69aee75eedcc81908088ff4dbb8be56b |
completed | March 9, 2026, 3:29 p.m. |
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:22 p.m.