Triple
T39074
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Rogers |
E773
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasNotableFieldOfBearers |
P2531
|
FINISHED |
| Object | science |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: science | Statement: [Rogers, hasNotableFieldOfBearers, science]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasNotableFieldOfBearers Context triple: [Rogers, hasNotableFieldOfBearers, science]
-
A.
hasNotableBearer
Indicates that an entity (such as a name, title, or identifier) is borne by at least one notable person or entity.
-
B.
hasNotableMember
Indicates that a group, organization, or collection includes at least one member who is distinguished or noteworthy in some significant way.
-
C.
hasNotableSubject
Indicates that an entity is associated with a subject that is particularly significant, prominent, or noteworthy in relation to it.
-
D.
hasNotableFeature
Indicates that an entity possesses a specific characteristic, trait, or attribute that is considered significant or noteworthy.
-
E.
notableHolder
Indicates that a person or entity is a distinguished or prominent holder of a particular position, title, or role.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a247a8f6c08190bac804906d62ed5a |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a24b4d5bd08190a3a48eb26e67768c |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:56 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a24ab6141881908701106aa97e4735 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:53 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a24b4c59b08190854b5335f5eff790 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:56 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:46 a.m.