Triple
T3902119
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Frederick Philipse II |
E90517
|
entity |
| Predicate | language used |
P18209
|
FINISHED |
| Object | English |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: English | Statement: [Frederick Philipse II, language used, English]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: language used Context triple: [Frederick Philipse II, language used, English]
-
A.
languageUse
chosen
Indicates the language or languages an entity uses for communication, expression, or interaction.
-
B.
languageOfExpression
Indicates that a particular language is used as the medium or form in which an expression (such as a text, utterance, or work) is realized.
-
C.
languageOfCommunications
Indicates that a specified language is used as the medium for communications associated with an entity or interaction.
-
D.
languageProvision
Indicates that one entity supplies, supports, or makes available a particular language (or set of languages) for use by another entity.
-
E.
languageDesigned
Indicates that one entity created or developed the language used or associated with another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69aed95d315881908cbf1bf4a7215fbf |
completed | March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aef1abe2dc81909c18aeae9b286898 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 4:13 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69aee75cff148190b6d5979d17fae085 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 3:29 p.m. |
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:21 p.m.