Triple

T389515
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Assyrians E8850 entity
Predicate autonymLanguage P1435 FINISHED
Object Syriac LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Syriac | Statement: [Assyrians, autonymLanguage, Syriac]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: autonymLanguage
Context triple: [Assyrians, autonymLanguage, Syriac]
  • A. hasEndonym chosen
    Indicates that an entity has a name or designation used by native speakers or within its own local language or community.
  • B. nativeLanguage
    Indicates the language that a person or entity originally learned and uses as their primary or first language.
  • C. isLanguageOf
    Indicates that a particular language is used as the official or primary language associated with a given entity (such as a person, document, or region).
  • D. recognizedAsDistinctLanguageFrom
    Indicates that one language is formally acknowledged or treated as a separate and distinct language from another, rather than as a dialect or variant of it.
  • E. recognizedRegionalLanguage
    Indicates that a language holds officially recognized status within a specific region or subnational jurisdiction.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2e7f55c60819097aff65ea2ca2832 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:04 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a2ec5bdc848190826701590070497b completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:23 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2e96960608190bdd342da9c5ddb5e completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:11 p.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:08 p.m.