Triple

T388702
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Raetic language E8833 entity
Predicate grammaticalType P12863 FINISHED
Object suffixing language LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: suffixing language | Statement: [Raetic language, grammaticalType, suffixing language]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: grammaticalType
Context triple: [Raetic language, grammaticalType, suffixing language]
  • A. grammaticalForm
    Indicates the specific grammatical structure or morphological form that an expression or word takes in a given linguistic context.
  • B. grammaticalStructure
    Indicates the way linguistic elements are organized and related within a sentence or phrase according to grammatical rules.
  • C. linguisticType
    Indicates the type or category of language or linguistic system associated with an entity (e.g., spoken, signed, written, or other linguistic modality).
  • D. sentenceType
    Indicates the classification of a sentence according to its communicative function or structural type (e.g., question, statement, command).
  • E. hasGrammaticalGender
    Indicates that one entity assigns or possesses a specific grammatical gender in relation to another entity (such as a word, phrase, or linguistic unit).
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2e7f55c60819097aff65ea2ca2832 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:04 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a2ec5988708190aa86d9460cecf050 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:23 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2e96960608190bdd342da9c5ddb5e completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:11 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a2ebac09408190be802b96bb203d5f completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:20 p.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:08 p.m.