Triple
T3886298
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | United Kingdom defence policy |
E92949
|
entity |
| Predicate | guidedBy |
P12723
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Strategic Defence and Security Review 2010
The Strategic Defence and Security Review 2010 was a major UK government assessment that reshaped the country’s defence and security priorities, capabilities, and spending in the early 2010s.
|
E395687
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Strategic Defence and Security Review 2010 | Statement: [United Kingdom defence policy, guidedBy, Strategic Defence and Security Review 2010]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Strategic Defence and Security Review 2010 Context triple: [United Kingdom defence policy, guidedBy, Strategic Defence and Security Review 2010]
-
A.
UK Strategic Defence and Security Review 2015
The UK Strategic Defence and Security Review 2015 is a British government policy document that set out the country’s defence and national security priorities and force structure for the coming decade, including decisions on nuclear deterrence and major military capabilities.
-
B.
Equipment Plan of the UK Ministry of Defence
The Equipment Plan of the UK Ministry of Defence is a long-term financial and capability programme that sets out how the department will fund, acquire, and sustain the armed forces’ major equipment and support over a multi-year period.
-
C.
Quadrennial Defense Review
The Quadrennial Defense Review was a periodic U.S. Department of Defense strategic planning report that assessed military priorities, capabilities, and force structure to guide long-term defense policy and resource decisions.
-
D.
Integrated Review of Security, Defence, Development and Foreign Policy 2021
The Integrated Review of Security, Defence, Development and Foreign Policy 2021 is a major UK government strategy document that sets out the country’s long-term priorities and posture in defence, security, international development, and foreign affairs in the post-Brexit era.
-
E.
NATO Defence Planning Process
The NATO Defence Planning Process is the Alliance’s structured framework for translating political guidance into concrete military capability targets and coordinating member states’ efforts to develop and deliver those capabilities.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Strategic Defence and Security Review 2010 Triple: [United Kingdom defence policy, guidedBy, Strategic Defence and Security Review 2010]
Generated description
The Strategic Defence and Security Review 2010 was a major UK government assessment that reshaped the country’s defence and security priorities, capabilities, and spending in the early 2010s.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Strategic Defence and Security Review 2010 Target entity description: The Strategic Defence and Security Review 2010 was a major UK government assessment that reshaped the country’s defence and security priorities, capabilities, and spending in the early 2010s.
-
A.
UK Strategic Defence and Security Review 2015
The UK Strategic Defence and Security Review 2015 is a British government policy document that set out the country’s defence and national security priorities and force structure for the coming decade, including decisions on nuclear deterrence and major military capabilities.
-
B.
Equipment Plan of the UK Ministry of Defence
The Equipment Plan of the UK Ministry of Defence is a long-term financial and capability programme that sets out how the department will fund, acquire, and sustain the armed forces’ major equipment and support over a multi-year period.
-
C.
Quadrennial Defense Review
The Quadrennial Defense Review was a periodic U.S. Department of Defense strategic planning report that assessed military priorities, capabilities, and force structure to guide long-term defense policy and resource decisions.
-
D.
Integrated Review of Security, Defence, Development and Foreign Policy 2021
The Integrated Review of Security, Defence, Development and Foreign Policy 2021 is a major UK government strategy document that sets out the country’s long-term priorities and posture in defence, security, international development, and foreign affairs in the post-Brexit era.
-
E.
NATO Defence Planning Process
The NATO Defence Planning Process is the Alliance’s structured framework for translating political guidance into concrete military capability targets and coordinating member states’ efforts to develop and deliver those capabilities.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69aed9697de0819087c2559295ff3d12 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 2:30 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aeec942bfc8190a398fe370715a28b |
completed | March 9, 2026, 3:51 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69b5125d0d208190a26ddd1bd4bca0d8 |
completed | March 14, 2026, 7:46 a.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69b514fbe12881908359855dc67aa967 |
completed | March 14, 2026, 7:57 a.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69b51551156c8190aebed2e51740f14d |
completed | March 14, 2026, 7:59 a.m. |
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:20 p.m.