Triple
T3886051
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 944 Hidalgo |
E92942
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasColorIndex |
P48842
|
FINISHED |
| Object | very red (typical of D-type) |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: very red (typical of D-type) | Statement: [944 Hidalgo, hasColorIndex, very red (typical of D-type)]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasColorIndex Context triple: [944 Hidalgo, hasColorIndex, very red (typical of D-type)]
-
A.
hasColorReference
Indicates that one entity serves as a reference or source for determining or specifying the color associated with another entity.
-
B.
hasColorInfo
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with specific color-related information or attributes.
-
C.
hasColorSymbol
Indicates that one entity is associated with another entity that serves as its representative or symbolic color.
-
D.
hasColorProcess
Indicates a relationship where an entity is associated with a specific method or process used to apply, change, or manage its color.
-
E.
hasCenterColor
Indicates that an entity possesses a central region whose color is specified or characterized.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69aed9697de0819087c2559295ff3d12 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 2:30 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aeec942bfc8190a398fe370715a28b |
completed | March 9, 2026, 3:51 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69aee759609c8190985e96ec6d96dedd |
completed | March 9, 2026, 3:29 p.m. |
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:20 p.m.