Triple
T3872124
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Caenorhabditis elegans |
E92409
|
entity |
| Predicate | transgenesisMethod |
P51608
|
FINISHED |
| Object | microinjection of DNA into gonad |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: microinjection of DNA into gonad | Statement: [Caenorhabditis elegans, transgenesisMethod, microinjection of DNA into gonad]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: transgenesisMethod Context triple: [Caenorhabditis elegans, transgenesisMethod, microinjection of DNA into gonad]
-
A.
geneticExchange
Indicates the transfer or sharing of genetic material between entities, resulting in altered or recombined genetic information.
-
B.
breedingMethod
Indicates the technique or process by which organisms are bred or reproduced.
-
C.
plasmids
Indicates that one entity is a plasmid that carries or is associated with genetic material related to the other entity.
-
D.
experimentedOn
Indicates that one entity conducted experiments or tests on another entity as the subject of investigation.
-
E.
geneticReassortmentOf
Indicates a relationship where genetic material from different sources is mixed and reorganized to form a new genetic combination in the target entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69aed967448c819086c4b358d37b25aa |
completed | March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aeec5691148190b469af0bee9154db |
completed | March 9, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69aee754dddc8190936e1f9c40a770db |
completed | March 9, 2026, 3:29 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69aee80858a481909961a33fb50ff8d1 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:20 p.m.