Triple
T38693387
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Battle of Cocos |
E949929
|
entity |
| Predicate | AustralianCommander |
P191539
|
FINISHED |
| Object | John Glossop |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: John Glossop | Statement: [Battle of Cocos, AustralianCommander, John Glossop]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: AustralianCommander Context triple: [Battle of Cocos, AustralianCommander, John Glossop]
-
A.
ScottishCommander
Indicates that an entity serves as a military commander who is Scottish or associated with Scotland.
-
B.
RepublicanCommander
Indicates that an individual serves as a military commander for the Republican side in a conflict.
-
C.
UnionCommanderOfAssault
Indicates that the subject served as the commanding Union officer in charge of a specific military assault.
-
D.
SpartanCommander
Indicates that one entity serves as a military commander or leader over Spartan forces or warriors.
-
E.
commander
Indicates that one entity holds authoritative military or organizational control over another entity or group.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76f0124408190bb39c3040734846b |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fcdfbc71c481908ba7f87907b17782 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 6:53 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fcdbe580b8819087f143596b2c79c0 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 6:37 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fcdfbafbf48190abe38ec0003a6419 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 6:53 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:33 p.m.