Triple

T38661240
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Kāśyapīya school E940339 entity
Predicate hasScripturalCollection P5605 FINISHED
Object its own Āgama collection LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: its own Āgama collection | Statement: [Kāśyapīya school, hasScripturalCollection, its own Āgama collection]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasScripturalCollection
Context triple: [Kāśyapīya school, hasScripturalCollection, its own Āgama collection]
  • A. hasScripture chosen
    Indicates that one entity possesses, is associated with, or is defined by a particular scripture or set of scriptural texts.
  • B. hasSacredText
    Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a particular sacred or religious text.
  • C. regardedAsScriptureBy
    Indicates that something is considered to be sacred scripture or canonical religious text by a particular person, group, or tradition.
  • D. hasLanguageOfScripture
    Indicates that an entity’s scriptural or sacred texts are written or expressed in a specified language.
  • E. hasLiturgicalBook
    Indicates that one entity possesses, uses, or is associated with a specific liturgical book in a religious or worship context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76edfde348190bf6529d9f49ecd62 completed May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fde9fc184c8190bebef35df0e76076 completed May 8, 2026, 1:49 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fde6e5beb4819094945a695e961d88 completed May 8, 2026, 1:36 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:33 p.m.