Triple
T38656438
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Adair v. United States |
E939902
|
entity |
| Predicate | constitutionalBasisForInvalidation |
P16770
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause | Statement: [Adair v. United States, constitutionalBasisForInvalidation, Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: constitutionalBasisForInvalidation Context triple: [Adair v. United States, constitutionalBasisForInvalidation, Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause]
-
A.
constitutionalBasisOfHolding
Indicates that one legal holding is grounded in, justified by, or derived from a specific constitutional provision or principle.
-
B.
hasConstitutionalBasisIn
chosen
Indicates that something derives its legal authority, justification, or foundation from a specific constitutional provision or framework.
-
C.
constitutionalEffect
Indicates the impact or consequence that something has on a constitution or constitutional order.
-
D.
constitutionalChallenge
Indicates a legal action or argument asserting that a law, policy, or governmental act violates a constitution and should be reviewed or invalidated.
-
E.
declaredUnconstitutionalInCase
Indicates that a law, policy, or action was ruled unconstitutional in a specific legal case.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76ede49648190a48bfe47032a05a3 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fe6e492bf8819080b25221d13445ea |
completed | May 8, 2026, 11:14 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fe6dd33a6881908fe9bbbc184cab51 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 11:12 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:33 p.m.