Triple
T38649119
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Reassembling the Social |
E938793
|
entity |
| Predicate | advancesTheory |
P47923
|
FINISHED |
| Object | actor-network theory |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: actor-network theory | Statement: [Reassembling the Social, advancesTheory, actor-network theory]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: advancesTheory Context triple: [Reassembling the Social, advancesTheory, actor-network theory]
-
A.
developsTheory
chosen
Indicates that one entity formulates, elaborates, or advances a theoretical framework or explanation concerning another entity.
-
B.
coversTheory
Indicates that one entity includes, addresses, or explains the theoretical concepts associated with another entity.
-
C.
extendsTheoryOf
Indicates that one theory builds upon, broadens, or elaborates the concepts, assumptions, or results of another theory.
-
D.
hasTheory
Indicates that an entity possesses, is associated with, or is characterized by a particular theory.
-
E.
theoreticalInspiration
Indicates that one entity serves as a conceptual or intellectual source of ideas, models, or frameworks that inform or shape the theory or approach of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76ed948ec81908ce7811608a8f359 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fcdfbc71c481908ba7f87907b17782 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 6:53 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fcdbe580b8819087f143596b2c79c0 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 6:37 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:32 p.m.