Triple

T38643703
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Warfronts E938664 entity
Predicate hasDifficultySetting P201164 FINISHED
Object single baseline difficulty LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: single baseline difficulty | Statement: [Warfronts, hasDifficultySetting, single baseline difficulty]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDifficultySetting
Context triple: [Warfronts, hasDifficultySetting, single baseline difficulty]
  • A. hasDifficultyClass
    Indicates that something (such as a task, challenge, or problem) is associated with a specific level of difficulty or complexity.
  • B. hasDifficultyContext
    Indicates that something’s difficulty is defined, interpreted, or constrained within a particular situational or contextual framework.
  • C. hasDifficultyDescription
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a textual description explaining its level or nature of difficulty.
  • D. hasDifficultyEffect
    Indicates that one entity causes a change in the difficulty level or challenge associated with another entity or activity.
  • E. hasMeasurementDifficulty
    Indicates that performing a measurement on something is challenging or problematic in some way.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76ed948ec81908ce7811608a8f359 completed May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ffcc6182b48190afb598ced6500e66 completed May 10, 2026, 12:08 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ffcbb363748190bc6f8d038fba44ff completed May 10, 2026, 12:05 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69ffcc60dae48190b76b3eb7e2ce5103 completed May 10, 2026, 12:08 a.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:32 p.m.