Triple
T38641061
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | iPhone SE (2nd generation) |
E938594
|
entity |
| Predicate | performanceComparableTo |
P62967
|
FINISHED |
| Object | iPhone 11 series |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: iPhone 11 series | Statement: [iPhone SE (2nd generation), performanceComparableTo, iPhone 11 series]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: performanceComparableTo Context triple: [iPhone SE (2nd generation), performanceComparableTo, iPhone 11 series]
-
A.
performanceDescribedAs
Indicates that a performance is characterized or labeled using a particular description or evaluative term.
-
B.
performanceAs
Indicates that one entity serves in a particular role, character, or capacity within a performance or presentation involving another entity.
-
C.
performanceWith
Indicates a relationship where two or more entities participate together in the same performance or staged presentation.
-
D.
performanceBasis
Indicates that one entity’s performance is evaluated, determined, or justified on the basis of another specified factor, standard, or reference.
-
E.
technologyComparableTo
chosen
Indicates that one technology can be meaningfully compared to another in terms of capability, performance, or relevant characteristics.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76ed948ec81908ce7811608a8f359 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ff79e7206c8190a809b5f2a6261378 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 6:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ff798356b881908645074fb3a96517 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 6:14 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:32 p.m.