Triple
T38637004
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Azure Stack Hub |
E937591
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasHardwarePartner |
P1136
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Dell EMC |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Dell EMC | Statement: [Azure Stack Hub, hasHardwarePartner, Dell EMC]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasHardwarePartner Context triple: [Azure Stack Hub, hasHardwarePartner, Dell EMC]
-
A.
hasNetworkPartner
Indicates that an entity is connected to another entity through a formal or recognized network partnership relationship.
-
B.
hasPartner
chosen
Indicates that one entity is in a partner relationship (such as romantic, life, or business partnership) with another entity.
-
C.
supportsHardwareVendor
Indicates that one entity provides assistance, resources, or endorsement to a hardware vendor in fulfilling its products or services.
-
D.
hasHardwareCompatibilityWith
Indicates that two hardware components or systems can operate together correctly and reliably without conflicts or incompatibilities.
-
E.
usesHardwareVendor
Indicates that one entity relies on or employs the hardware products or services provided by a specific hardware vendor.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76ed5ca3c81909288f61fbf37b359 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fcdfbc71c481908ba7f87907b17782 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 6:53 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fcdbe580b8819087f143596b2c79c0 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 6:37 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:32 p.m.