Triple
T38619204
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Swift F.7 |
E936820
|
entity |
| Predicate | aircraftImprovementsOverPredecessor |
P5243
|
FINISHED |
| Object | refined performance |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: refined performance | Statement: [Swift F.7, aircraftImprovementsOverPredecessor, refined performance]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: aircraftImprovementsOverPredecessor Context triple: [Swift F.7, aircraftImprovementsOverPredecessor, refined performance]
-
A.
aircraftModification
chosen
Indicates a relationship where an aircraft undergoes a change, upgrade, or alteration to its structure, systems, or configuration.
-
B.
modernizationForAircraftType
Indicates that a particular modernization effort or upgrade is intended for, or applicable to, a specific type or category of aircraft.
-
C.
aircraftGeneration
Indicates a generational relationship between aircraft, such as one model being a successor, predecessor, or belonging to a specific generation relative to another.
-
D.
aircraftDesignFeature
Indicates a relationship where a specific design feature is associated with, or incorporated into, an aircraft.
-
E.
developedAircraft
Indicates that an entity (such as a person or organization) was responsible for designing, creating, or engineering a particular aircraft.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76ed403208190b862dc795171353f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fce7671f108190bf3ebf54339068b5 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 7:26 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fce5b5a84c81908ac1b5b9f08d48d0 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 7:19 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:32 p.m.