Triple

T38612716
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject MLE E934523 entity
Predicate becameProminent P24496 FINISHED
Object early 21st century LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: early 21st century | Statement: [MLE, becameProminent, early 21st century]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: becameProminent
Context triple: [MLE, becameProminent, early 21st century]
  • A. gainedProminenceFor
    Indicates that an entity became widely recognized or notable specifically because of another entity, action, or achievement.
  • B. gainedProminenceAs
    Indicates that an entity became widely recognized or notable in the role, capacity, or identity specified by another entity.
  • C. gainedProminenceUnder
    Indicates that an entity rose to greater importance, influence, or recognition during the leadership, authority, or period associated with another entity.
  • D. wasProminent
    Indicates that an entity held a position of significant importance, influence, or visibility within a particular context or period.
  • E. wasProminentIn chosen
    Indicates that an entity was notably active, influential, or widely recognized within a particular field, context, or time period.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76eccd6d081909ccce171011739a1 completed May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fcdb0de8c08190928cd1323f80ab5c completed May 7, 2026, 6:33 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fcd9017dd88190b32a73fe78909740 completed May 7, 2026, 6:25 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:32 p.m.