Triple

T38599750
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Elvira Madigan E934175 entity
Predicate movementAssociatedWithNickname P193039 FINISHED
Object second movement LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: second movement | Statement: [Elvira Madigan, movementAssociatedWithNickname, second movement]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: movementAssociatedWithNickname
Context triple: [Elvira Madigan, movementAssociatedWithNickname, second movement]
  • A. nicknamedFor
    Indicates that one entity serves as the source, inspiration, or reason for another entity’s nickname.
  • B. hasNicknames
    Indicates that an entity is known or referred to by one or more alternative informal names.
  • C. hasNicknamedEntityType
    Indicates that an entity is associated with another entity type specifically in the role of being its nickname or informal name.
  • D. notableNickname
    Indicates that one entity is a well-known or widely recognized nickname or moniker for another entity.
  • E. dedicatedToOrNicknameOf
    Indicates that one entity is either the dedicatee of something (e.g., a work, object, or honor) or serves as an alternative name or nickname for another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76ecc17688190b389b693a5927501 completed May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fd35d108908190b79b1e8e6bbd62aa completed May 8, 2026, 1:01 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fd34cb46108190b43c3b7f67ec4cd4 completed May 8, 2026, 12:56 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fd35d029588190a525aa8a506e7708 completed May 8, 2026, 1:01 a.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:32 p.m.