Triple
T38599274
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | C major |
E934164
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasSubdominantChord |
P202593
|
FINISHED |
| Object | F major triad |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: F major triad | Statement: [C major, hasSubdominantChord, F major triad]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSubdominantChord Context triple: [C major, hasSubdominantChord, F major triad]
-
A.
subdominantKey
Indicates the musical key that functions as the subdominant (built on the fourth scale degree) in relation to a given tonic key.
-
B.
dominantNote
Indicates that one note functions as the dominant (fifth scale degree) in relation to another note, typically resolving to it harmonically.
-
C.
dominantTriad
Indicates that one entity forms the primary or controlling component within a three-part (triadic) relationship involving the other two entities.
-
D.
hasHarmonicMinorVariant
Indicates that one musical element (such as a scale, key, or melody) has a corresponding form that is derived from or expressed in the harmonic minor variant.
-
E.
usesChord
Indicates that one entity employs or incorporates a particular chord in its structure, performance, or composition.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76ecc17688190b389b693a5927501 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a009d623f6c8190b702e2892c52fbb2 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 2:59 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a009a3050d48190b64567f28e6ea463 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 2:46 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_6a009d6144d48190889bc704368d8878 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 2:59 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:32 p.m.