Triple
T38599268
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | C major |
E934164
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasMediantChord |
P142443
|
FINISHED |
| Object | E minor |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: E minor | Statement: [C major, hasMediantChord, E minor]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMediantChord Context triple: [C major, hasMediantChord, E minor]
-
A.
mediantTriad
chosen
Indicates a relationship where three elements form a central or intermediate triad, typically functioning as a mediating or connecting chord or grouping between other related elements.
-
B.
usesChord
Indicates that one entity employs or incorporates a particular chord in its structure, performance, or composition.
-
C.
submediantTriad
Indicates a harmonic relationship where a triad is built on the submediant scale degree, functioning as the chord rooted on the sixth degree of the key.
-
D.
hasHarmonicMinorVariant
Indicates that one musical element (such as a scale, key, or melody) has a corresponding form that is derived from or expressed in the harmonic minor variant.
-
E.
usesChordChangesOf
Indicates that one musical work employs the same or substantially similar chord progression as another work.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76ecc17688190b389b693a5927501 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ffc704e1e88190884928a6a5c55a87 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 11:45 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ffc6b483d881908ad872e25fa6abc5 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 11:43 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:32 p.m.