Triple
T38593046
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Death Blossom |
E932496
|
entity |
| Predicate | canSecure |
P191261
|
FINISHED |
| Object | multi-kills |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: multi-kills | Statement: [Death Blossom, canSecure, multi-kills]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canSecure Context triple: [Death Blossom, canSecure, multi-kills]
-
A.
isSecureFor
Indicates that one entity provides a level of protection or safety that makes it appropriate or safe for use, access, or interaction by another entity.
-
B.
canUseSecurity
Indicates that one entity is permitted or able to employ or access a specified security mechanism, feature, or resource.
-
C.
securedVia
Indicates that something is protected, authenticated, or made safe through a specified method, mechanism, or channel.
-
D.
alsoSecured
Indicates that an entity has obtained or provided additional security or collateral in connection with an existing secured obligation or arrangement.
-
E.
securedAgainst
Indicates that one entity is protected or safeguarded against threats, risks, or harmful actions originating from another entity or source.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76ec654d48190b421111cf26e54d9 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fcdb0de8c08190928cd1323f80ab5c |
completed | May 7, 2026, 6:33 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fcd9017dd88190b32a73fe78909740 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 6:25 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fcdb0cf6008190b27046b694f84356 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 6:33 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:32 p.m.