Triple

T38590998
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Hrothgar E932451 entity
Predicate hasCustomizationLimitation P99 FINISHED
Object restricted hairstyles LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: restricted hairstyles | Statement: [Hrothgar, hasCustomizationLimitation, restricted hairstyles]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCustomizationLimitation
Context triple: [Hrothgar, hasCustomizationLimitation, restricted hairstyles]
  • A. hasLimitation chosen
    Indicates that an entity is subject to a constraint, restriction, or boundary that limits its scope, capability, or applicability.
  • B. hasIntegrationLimitType
    Indicates the type or nature of the integration limit applied in a given relationship or process.
  • C. hasCustomizationPotential
    Indicates that an entity can be adapted, modified, or personalized beyond its default configuration.
  • D. hasCommunicationLimitation
    Indicates that an entity is subject to some restriction, constraint, or reduced capacity in its ability to communicate.
  • E. hasCustomizationArea
    Indicates that an entity includes or is associated with a specific area or section dedicated to customization or configuration.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76ec654d48190b421111cf26e54d9 completed May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fec00f27988190955de6b6348a4d97 completed May 9, 2026, 5:03 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69febd52037c8190b475dbd50fdbc13e completed May 9, 2026, 4:51 a.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:32 p.m.