Triple

T3858140
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Nara people E90068 entity
Predicate ethnolinguisticFamily P46225 FINISHED
Object Nilo-Saharan (proposed, for Nara language) LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Nilo-Saharan (proposed, for Nara language) | Statement: [Nara people, ethnolinguisticFamily, Nilo-Saharan (proposed, for Nara language)]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: ethnolinguisticFamily
Context triple: [Nara people, ethnolinguisticFamily, Nilo-Saharan (proposed, for Nara language)]
  • A. languageFamilyBranchOf
    Indicates that one language family branch is a sub-group or subdivision within a larger language family.
  • B. ethnolinguisticGroups chosen
    Indicates a relationship where groups are categorized or associated based on shared ethnic and linguistic characteristics.
  • C. languageFamily
    Indicates that two or more languages belong to the same genealogical language family or linguistic lineage.
  • D. languageOfFamily
    Indicates the language or languages commonly used or associated with a particular family.
  • E. ancientLanguageFamily
    Indicates that one language belongs to or descends from a historically ancient family of related languages.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69aed95b3c088190a8f85d19e6070599 completed March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69aeec1e68f88190941c39221486f6ae completed March 9, 2026, 3:49 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69aee752c8a48190a670f73ed0bf1e61 completed March 9, 2026, 3:29 p.m.
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:19 p.m.