Triple

T38562029
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Strahlenkranz E928100 entity
Predicate typographicApproach P165172 FINISHED
Object sans-serif preference LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: sans-serif preference | Statement: [Strahlenkranz, typographicApproach, sans-serif preference]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typographicApproach
Context triple: [Strahlenkranz, typographicApproach, sans-serif preference]
  • A. typographicPhilosophy chosen
    Indicates a relationship where an entity’s approach, principles, or theory concerning typography and its use is specified.
  • B. typographicClassification
    Indicates a relationship where an entity is assigned a specific typographic category or style classification.
  • C. typographicPreference
    Indicates a preferred typographic style or setting used for presenting or formatting content.
  • D. typographicLegacy
    Indicates a relationship where one typographic style, convention, or feature is inherited from, derived from, or historically influenced by another.
  • E. typographer
    Indicates that an entity is a person or agent whose role is to design, arrange, or set type for printed or digital text.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76eb8d1808190a588af29d8b266d6 completed May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fcdaa36f90819093f8661969990c7d completed May 7, 2026, 6:32 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fcd8fefc588190b063d7ea1ec87b07 completed May 7, 2026, 6:25 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:32 p.m.