Triple

T38561771
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject MVG E928093 entity
Predicate hasSecondaryLanguageOfServiceInformation P9103 FINISHED
Object English LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: English | Statement: [MVG, hasSecondaryLanguageOfServiceInformation, English]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSecondaryLanguageOfServiceInformation
Context triple: [MVG, hasSecondaryLanguageOfServiceInformation, English]
  • A. hasSecondaryLanguage chosen
    Indicates that an entity possesses or uses a secondary language in addition to its primary language.
  • B. secondaryLanguageSupport
    Indicates that an entity provides assistance, services, or functionality in an additional (non-primary) language.
  • C. hasSecondaryLanguageFamily
    Indicates that an entity has an additional, non-primary association with a particular language family.
  • D. hasSecondaryNationalLanguage
    Indicates that an entity possesses an officially recognized secondary national language in addition to its primary national language.
  • E. hasSecondaryLanguageNearby
    Indicates that an entity has at least one secondary language present or used in its immediate vicinity or surrounding context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76eb8d1808190a588af29d8b266d6 completed May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a00d820a7788190a8d54625cd87be68 completed May 10, 2026, 7:10 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a00d7c5b40c8190b80413238d04e81e completed May 10, 2026, 7:08 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:32 p.m.