Triple
T3856127
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Center Court |
E90018
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasDecorInspiredBy |
P41791
|
FINISHED |
| Object | athletic activities |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: athletic activities | Statement: [Center Court, hasDecorInspiredBy, athletic activities]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDecorInspiredBy Context triple: [Center Court, hasDecorInspiredBy, athletic activities]
-
A.
partlyInspiredBy
Indicates that one entity has been influenced to some extent, but not wholly, by another entity in its creation, development, or form.
-
B.
inspiredByArtist
Indicates that one entity’s work, style, or creation is influenced or motivated by the artistic output or persona of another artist.
-
C.
hasInspirationSource
chosen
Indicates that something derives its creative motivation, ideas, or influence from a particular source.
-
D.
hasDecor
Indicates that one entity possesses, features, or is adorned with a particular decorative element or style.
-
E.
inspiredArtist
Indicates that one artist has served as a source of creative influence or inspiration for another artist.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69aed95b3c088190a8f85d19e6070599 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aeec07d45081909b8f3e35eb710f4c |
completed | March 9, 2026, 3:49 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69aee752c8a48190a670f73ed0bf1e61 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 3:29 p.m. |
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:19 p.m.