Triple
T3853926
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Grotte de Niaux |
E85363
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasProtectionReason |
P24667
|
FINISHED |
| Object | outstanding Paleolithic art |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: outstanding Paleolithic art | Statement: [Grotte de Niaux, hasProtectionReason, outstanding Paleolithic art]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasProtectionReason Context triple: [Grotte de Niaux, hasProtectionReason, outstanding Paleolithic art]
-
A.
protectionReason
chosen
Indicates the justification or cause for which protection is provided or required in the relationship between entities.
-
B.
isProtectedFor
Indicates that one entity is safeguarded or preserved specifically for the benefit, use, or rights of another entity.
-
C.
isProtectedBy
Indicates that one entity provides protection, defense, or safeguarding for another entity.
-
D.
isProtectedFrom
Indicates that one entity is safeguarded or shielded against harm, damage, or adverse effects caused by another entity or factor.
-
E.
protectionType
Indicates the kind or method of protection that is applied to or associated with an entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69aed936de1c81908f91bed80f70abb2 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aeec0438308190865ff74bee5a1cf2 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 3:49 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69aee750377c8190af70c79768c0edd8 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 3:29 p.m. |
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:19 p.m.