Triple
T3850851
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | R v Thorpe and Others (1979) |
E85290
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasOutcomeForJeremyThorpe |
P51935
|
FINISHED |
| Object | acquittal |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: acquittal | Statement: [R v Thorpe and Others (1979), hasOutcomeForJeremyThorpe, acquittal]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasOutcomeForJeremyThorpe Context triple: [R v Thorpe and Others (1979), hasOutcomeForJeremyThorpe, acquittal]
-
A.
finalRoundPercentageEdMiliband
Indicates the percentage of votes Ed Miliband received in the final round of a voting or selection process.
-
B.
hasBritishPrimeMinisterParticipant
Indicates that a given event, activity, or situation involves a person serving as the British Prime Minister as a participant.
-
C.
resultForGreatBritain
Indicates the outcome or performance achieved specifically by Great Britain in a given event, context, or measurement.
-
D.
finalRoundPercentageDavidMiliband
Indicates the percentage of votes David Miliband received in the final round of a selection or election process.
-
E.
wonParliamentaryElection
Indicates that one party or candidate achieved victory in a parliamentary election over others.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69aed936de1c81908f91bed80f70abb2 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aeebcf67788190975105131baabc4b |
completed | March 9, 2026, 3:48 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69aee750377c8190af70c79768c0edd8 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 3:29 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69aee8d9b328819080158be59e5bcc97 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 3:35 p.m. |
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:19 p.m.