Triple

T38494386
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Dagorlad E919647 entity
Predicate battleCommanderOpposing P87947 FINISHED
Object Sauron NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Sauron | Statement: [Dagorlad, battleCommanderOpposing, Sauron]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: battleCommanderOpposing
Context triple: [Dagorlad, battleCommanderOpposing, Sauron]
  • A. opposingCommander
    Indicates that one entity serves as the commanding officer of a force that is in opposition or conflict with the force commanded by another entity.
  • B. opposingCommanderSide chosen
    Indicates that one commander is on the opposing or enemy side relative to another commander in a conflict or confrontation.
  • C. opponentCommanderAttacker
    Indicates that the referenced commander is the opposing side’s commander who is initiating or carrying out an attack.
  • D. commandedForcesAgainst
    Indicates that one entity held command authority over military or armed forces engaged in opposition to another entity.
  • E. commanderBelligerent2
    Indicates that the subject serves as a commander for the second belligerent party in a conflict or war.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e9ddd4481908f8c04439d848f9d completed May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fce7671f108190bf3ebf54339068b5 completed May 7, 2026, 7:26 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fce5b5a84c81908ac1b5b9f08d48d0 completed May 7, 2026, 7:19 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:31 p.m.