Triple

T38489614
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Angelo Pappas E918017 entity
Predicate undercoverOperationWith P195757 FINISHED
Object Johnny Utah NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Johnny Utah | Statement: [Angelo Pappas, undercoverOperationWith, Johnny Utah]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: undercoverOperationWith
Context triple: [Angelo Pappas, undercoverOperationWith, Johnny Utah]
  • A. undercoverIn
    Indicates that an entity is secretly operating within a group, organization, or environment under false or concealed identity.
  • B. undercoverFor
    Indicates that one entity is secretly acting on behalf of or within another entity, typically to gather information or carry out covert objectives without revealing their true affiliation.
  • C. undercoverAgainst
    Indicates that one entity is secretly acting in a covert or deceptive capacity directed against another entity.
  • D. undercoverExpertise
    Indicates that an entity possesses specialized skills or knowledge specifically related to operating or functioning effectively in undercover or covert roles.
  • E. resultOfUndercoverWork
    Indicates that something occurs as a consequence of, or is produced by, undercover investigative work.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e9894208190a129a553a60ca58c completed May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fde49a084081909d99b1e0258169d5 completed May 8, 2026, 1:26 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fde1d04bd881909a46ecbbf18dfe59 completed May 8, 2026, 1:14 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fde49953c481909ac352ab36fa9ff2 completed May 8, 2026, 1:26 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:31 p.m.