Triple

T38489520
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Johnny Utah E918014 entity
Predicate mainAntagonistRelationship P81119 FINISHED
Object Bodhi NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Bodhi | Statement: [Johnny Utah, mainAntagonistRelationship, Bodhi]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mainAntagonistRelationship
Context triple: [Johnny Utah, mainAntagonistRelationship, Bodhi]
  • A. relationshipWithAntagonist
    Indicates a relationship or connection that an entity has with an opposing or adversarial figure in a narrative or context.
  • B. hasAntagonisticProtagonist
    Indicates that the work features a main character who opposes or undermines the typical heroic or moral expectations of a traditional protagonist.
  • C. antagonistOf
    Indicates a relationship where one entity actively opposes, conflicts with, or serves as an adversary to another.
  • D. primaryAntagonists chosen
    Indicates that the referenced entities serve as the main opposing or adversarial forces in relation to a specified subject or narrative.
  • E. antagonistAlterEgoOf
    Indicates that one entity serves as the primary opposing force or enemy of another entity’s alternate identity or secret persona.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e9894208190a129a553a60ca58c completed May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fcdaa36f90819093f8661969990c7d completed May 7, 2026, 6:32 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fcd8fefc588190b063d7ea1ec87b07 completed May 7, 2026, 6:25 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:31 p.m.