Triple

T3848518
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Pandey E85231 entity
Predicate namingTradition P45665 FINISHED
Object patrilineal surname LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: patrilineal surname | Statement: [Pandey, namingTradition, patrilineal surname]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: namingTradition
Context triple: [Pandey, namingTradition, patrilineal surname]
  • A. hasTraditionalName
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a name traditionally used or recognized for it, often rooted in long-standing cultural or historical practice.
  • B. commonInOnomastics
    Indicates that a name, term, or pattern frequently appears or is widely used within the study and practice of naming (onomastics).
  • C. partOfOnomasticTradition chosen
    Indicates that something belongs to, or is included within, a particular onomastic (name-giving) tradition.
  • D. namingBasis
    Indicates that one entity serves as the reason, source, or criterion for how another entity is named or designated.
  • E. traditionAscribes
    Indicates that a tradition attributes or assigns a particular quality, role, origin, or action to an entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69aed936de1c81908f91bed80f70abb2 completed March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69aeebcc8a0481909c35161336bdfbf9 completed March 9, 2026, 3:48 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69aee750377c8190af70c79768c0edd8 completed March 9, 2026, 3:29 p.m.
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:19 p.m.