Triple
T38479191
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Evan Miller |
E915622
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalAppealResultedIn |
P97352
|
FINISHED |
| Object | U.S. Supreme Court review |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: U.S. Supreme Court review | Statement: [Evan Miller, legalAppealResultedIn, U.S. Supreme Court review]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalAppealResultedIn Context triple: [Evan Miller, legalAppealResultedIn, U.S. Supreme Court review]
-
A.
legalOutcome
Indicates the resulting legal status, decision, or consequence that follows from a legal process, action, or judgment.
-
B.
legalConclusion
Indicates that a situation, set of facts, or argument leads to or supports a specific determination or outcome under the law.
-
C.
legalCaseHeParticipatedInDecidedBy
chosen
Indicates that a legal case in which he participated was decided or adjudicated by a specified authority or court.
-
D.
legalCaseOutcomeAssociatedWith
Indicates that a particular legal case outcome is connected or linked to a specific related entity, such as a case, party, or legal proceeding.
-
E.
legalActionFiled
Indicates that a formal legal proceeding or complaint has been officially initiated with the appropriate authority or court.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e8ff5cc8190a88803369183845e |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a0031ed5d708190ab93516ad081ada6 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 7:21 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a0031b5dbd081908eb0f4dbb8a0eac3 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 7:20 a.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:31 p.m.