Triple
T3841460
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Santa Cruz Beach Boardwalk |
E93458
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasRide |
P30385
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Sea Swings |
E393472
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Sea Swings | Statement: [Santa Cruz Beach Boardwalk, hasRide, Sea Swings]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Sea Swings Context triple: [Santa Cruz Beach Boardwalk, hasRide, Sea Swings]
-
A.
Sea Swings
chosen
Sea Swings is an oceanfront swing ride attraction at the historic Santa Cruz Beach Boardwalk amusement park in California.
-
B.
Openwater
Openwater is a medical imaging and neurotechnology company developing high-resolution, low-cost brain and body imaging devices using novel optics and holography techniques.
-
C.
Bluewater
Bluewater is a large out-of-town shopping and leisure centre located in Kent, England.
-
D.
Pleasure Point
Pleasure Point is a renowned surf break and coastal neighborhood in Santa Cruz County, California, known for its consistent waves and laid-back beach culture.
-
E.
Seabreeze
Seabreeze was a former neighboring city to Daytona Beach, Florida, that was eventually incorporated into the larger Daytona Beach municipality.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69aed96ce578819084ab16e3439976c9 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 2:30 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aeebb235088190b115623e54ea2ab1 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 3:48 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69b5122ba6a4819099986e50f42f2a92 |
completed | March 14, 2026, 7:45 a.m. |
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:18 p.m.