Triple

T38388744
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Act III (Le Martyre de saint Sébastien) E899650 entity
Predicate hasParentWorkForm P58459 FINISHED
Object mystery play LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: mystery play | Statement: [Act III (Le Martyre de saint Sébastien), hasParentWorkForm, mystery play]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasParentWorkForm
Context triple: [Act III (Le Martyre de saint Sébastien), hasParentWorkForm, mystery play]
  • A. hasParentWork
    Indicates that one work is derived from, contained within, or otherwise subordinate to another, more primary work.
  • B. hasWorkForm chosen
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a particular form, format, or mode in which its work or activity is carried out or expressed.
  • C. hasParentWorkKey
    Indicates that an entity is associated with the identifier (key) of the parent work from which it is derived or of which it is a part.
  • D. hasChildInWork
    Indicates that one entity has a child who appears or is represented within the other entity’s work or creation.
  • E. hasParentWorkComposer
    Indicates that a work is related to the composer of its parent (containing or overarching) work.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e5c9b808190b486523f5c2f817d completed May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a007fc9d9688190af411d5841af34be completed May 10, 2026, 12:53 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a007f64813081909a2950336402073b completed May 10, 2026, 12:51 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:31 p.m.