Triple

T38383421
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Hårga E893814 entity
Predicate ownershipOfIntellectualProperty P35397 FINISHED
Object A24 NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: A24 | Statement: [Hårga, ownershipOfIntellectualProperty, A24]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: ownershipOfIntellectualProperty
Context triple: [Hårga, ownershipOfIntellectualProperty, A24]
  • A. ownsIntellectualProperty chosen
    Indicates that one entity holds legal ownership rights over the intellectual property created, produced, or associated with another entity.
  • B. usesIntellectualProperty
    Indicates that one entity makes use of another entity's intellectual property, such as patents, copyrights, trademarks, or trade secrets, in its activities or products.
  • C. intellectualPropertyType
    Indicates the specific category or kind of intellectual property associated with an entity (e.g., patent, copyright, trademark).
  • D. intellectualPropertyStatus
    Indicates the legal condition or protection state of an entity’s intellectual property, such as whether it is patented, copyrighted, trademarked, pending, or unprotected.
  • E. intellectualPropertyMode
    Indicates the manner or framework in which intellectual property rights are defined, managed, or applied within a given context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e4b1f748190a380696a16eae4a2 completed May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fcf825ca7081909d06b0df33eb33f9 completed May 7, 2026, 8:37 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fcf42160f0819096812a8bf590875e completed May 7, 2026, 8:20 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:31 p.m.