Triple
T38349023
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Maykopsky District (de facto, without being part of it) |
E1041624
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasTerritorialExclusion |
P2164
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Maykop |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Maykop | Statement: [Maykopsky District (de facto, without being part of it), hasTerritorialExclusion, Maykop]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTerritorialExclusion Context triple: [Maykopsky District (de facto, without being part of it), hasTerritorialExclusion, Maykop]
-
A.
excludesRegion
chosen
Indicates that one entity explicitly omits, leaves out, or does not apply to a specified region or geographic area.
-
B.
exemptedJurisdiction
Indicates that one jurisdiction is officially excluded from the application, scope, or requirements that apply to other jurisdictions.
-
C.
includesTerritorySubjectTo
Indicates that one entity’s territorial scope encompasses another territory that is subject to it.
-
D.
usesTerritoryFor
Indicates that an entity employs or exploits a particular territory for a specific purpose, function, or activity.
-
E.
definedTerritoryOf
Indicates that one entity specifies or establishes the official territorial boundaries or jurisdiction of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e2ad95481908c920c0e5c1c3e26 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fedfd913f48190bdcd450980868d9a |
completed | May 9, 2026, 7:18 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fedf58c6e88190821a7156054c9086 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 7:16 a.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:30 p.m.