Triple

T38328475
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Aizoon S.L. E1036854 entity
Predicate implicatedPerson P190792 FINISHED
Object Iñaki Urdangarin NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Iñaki Urdangarin | Statement: [Aizoon S.L., implicatedPerson, Iñaki Urdangarin]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: implicatedPerson
Context triple: [Aizoon S.L., implicatedPerson, Iñaki Urdangarin]
  • A. involvedActor
    Indicates that an entity participates as an actor or participant in the referenced event, activity, or situation.
  • B. allegedParticipant
    Indicates that an entity is claimed or suspected to have taken part in an event, action, or situation, without this participation being confirmed as fact.
  • C. involvedOfficer
    Indicates that an officer participated in, was connected to, or played a role in a particular incident, case, or event.
  • D. closelyInvolvedWith
    Indicates a relationship in which one entity is deeply and actively engaged with another’s activities, decisions, or affairs.
  • E. allegedActor
    Indicates that the subject is claimed or accused to be the actor responsible for a particular action or event, without confirming that the claim is true.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e1c16fc8190bde982289dd5106b completed May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fcd1499e2c81909bafd84dc4810f45 completed May 7, 2026, 5:52 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fcccf024ec819086383ffbb6cfc036 completed May 7, 2026, 5:33 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fcd148e6d4819082c118832ecc599b completed May 7, 2026, 5:52 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:30 p.m.