Triple
T38318761
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Colorado Rapids 2 |
E1033898
|
entity |
| Predicate | establishedAsReserveTeamOf |
P91589
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Colorado Rapids |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Colorado Rapids | Statement: [Colorado Rapids 2, establishedAsReserveTeamOf, Colorado Rapids]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: establishedAsReserveTeamOf Context triple: [Colorado Rapids 2, establishedAsReserveTeamOf, Colorado Rapids]
-
A.
hasReserveTeam
Indicates that an organization, typically a sports club, maintains a secondary or backup team formally associated with its main team.
-
B.
formerLeagueTeam
Indicates that an entity was previously a member team of a particular sports league but is no longer part of that league.
-
C.
leagueRepresented
Indicates that an entity serves as the official representative or participant of a particular league.
-
D.
foundedAsAffiliatedTeamOf
chosen
Indicates that an organization or team was originally established as an affiliated or subordinate team of another entity.
-
E.
stateTeamOf
Indicates that one entity is the official team representing a particular state associated with another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e132c408190969b3d35c04b87ae |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd4f39b5008190b83b3227ce22c509 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 2:49 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd4df17c548190a4e2a6fea70f7e10 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 2:44 a.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:30 p.m.