Triple

T3830404
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Grutter v. Bollinger E90995 entity
Predicate laterOverruledInPartBy P18493 FINISHED
Object Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina E390635 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina | Statement: [Grutter v. Bollinger, laterOverruledInPartBy, Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina
Context triple: [Grutter v. Bollinger, laterOverruledInPartBy, Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina]
  • A. Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College chosen
    Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College is a landmark 2023 U.S. Supreme Court case that sharply limited the use of race-conscious admissions policies in higher education, effectively ending affirmative action programs at colleges and universities nationwide.
  • B. Grutter v. Bollinger
    Grutter v. Bollinger is a landmark 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the limited use of race as one factor in holistic law school admissions to promote educational diversity.
  • C. Gratz v. Bollinger
    Gratz v. Bollinger is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down the University of Michigan’s undergraduate affirmative action admissions policy as violating the Equal Protection Clause by awarding automatic points based on race.
  • D. Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin
    Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that challenged the constitutionality of race-conscious admissions policies at public universities under the Equal Protection Clause.
  • E. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
    Regents of the University of California v. Bakke is a landmark 1978 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down rigid racial quotas in university admissions while upholding the constitutionality of using race as one factor among many to foster diversity.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69aed960b538819096561c8ed448dec9 completed March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69aef90ce3088190b82e8421ce9a4005 completed March 9, 2026, 4:45 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69b51c75ca9481908a41234f8ce0836d completed March 14, 2026, 8:29 a.m.
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:17 p.m.