Triple

T38297681
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Shi epoxidation E1032134 entity
Predicate usesAdditive P190784 FINISHED
Object buffer LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: buffer | Statement: [Shi epoxidation, usesAdditive, buffer]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesAdditive
Context triple: [Shi epoxidation, usesAdditive, buffer]
  • A. isAdditiveFor
    Indicates that one entity can be combined with another in a way that their effects or quantities sum together to produce a cumulative result.
  • B. usesIncrement
    Indicates that one entity applies or relies on an increment operation or incremental value derived from another entity.
  • C. hasAdditiveOrderOf1
    Indicates that one entity is the first in an ordered sequence of additives associated with another entity.
  • D. isAdditivelyIndecomposable
    Indicates that an entity (typically an ordinal or algebraic object) cannot be expressed as a nontrivial sum of two smaller entities of the same kind.
  • E. canBeAddedTo
    Indicates that one entity is capable of being combined or incorporated with another entity, typically without conflict or incompatibility.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e0f2084819091299d021625c3fe completed May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fcd1499e2c81909bafd84dc4810f45 completed May 7, 2026, 5:52 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fcccf024ec819086383ffbb6cfc036 completed May 7, 2026, 5:33 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fcd148e6d4819082c118832ecc599b completed May 7, 2026, 5:52 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:30 p.m.